General Reasoning is a London AI research lab (legal entity General Reasoning, Inc., US) working on models that operate over much longer time horizons. It builds OpenReward, a platform for serving RL environments (the vendor states 380+), and the open Open Reward Standard. It also ships open tooling (Firehorse, inspect-openreward, Harbor support), the KellyBench long-horizon benchmark and BackSearch, a paid point-in-time search API. It says its own language models launch in Q4 2026.
The homepage (as seen on 2026-10-05) promises 'a new generation of language models' in Q4 2026 that will 'showcase new innovations in pre-training and post-training to make models think and work at much longer time horizons.' The date the announcement first appeared is unknown.
Why it matters: GR is moving from environment and infra vendor to training its own models. Buyers using OpenReward to compare models should take that into account.
The talk video went up on the AI Engineer YouTube channel on 2026-07-31; the talk date itself is not stated. It covers RL-trained context-compaction policies, value critics to reduce gradient variance and sparse-reward problems on long trajectories, and the infrastructure limits of rollouts that last days or weeks (per the startuphub.ai write-up).
Why it matters: The clearest public statement of where GR's research is heading.
Search and fetch endpoints that return results as of a given date. It launched in July as a narrow preview over news and SEC filings. The 2026-09-13 update covers news, SEC filings, arXiv, Wikipedia and the general web. The docs show it working as tools through the OpenAI Responses API. Published price: $10 per 1,000 searches and $2 per 1,000 fetches; only successful requests are billed.
Why it matters: Forecasting and backtesting evals get a search tool that cannot leak future information. It is the company's first product with published usage pricing.
'KellyBench: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Sequential Decision Making' by Thomas Grady, Kip Parker, Iliyan Zarov, Henry Course, Chengxi Taylor and Ross Taylor. The abstract reports the best model averaging about -8% return over the season, and Claude Opus 4.6 scoring 26.5% on the strategy-sophistication rubric. The newer release-page leaderboard shows Claude Opus 4.7 at -3.7%.
Why it matters: A citable preprint that also names the core research team.
An open-source package that provides an Inspect Dataset (built from an environment split), a Solver and a Scorer for OpenReward environments. It detects the provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google or OpenRouter) from the Inspect model config. Repo: github.com/OpenRewardAI/inspect-openreward. License not stated.
Why it matters: Connects OpenReward to the eval framework that safety institutes and many lab eval teams use.
A Python library (pip install firehorse-cli; Apache-2.0 per its GitHub repo). It runs Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI and ReSum harnesses against OpenReward environments and writes JSONL trajectories with rewards, token usage and cost estimates. Supported providers: OpenRouter, OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.
Why it matters: Teams can produce eval runs and training trajectories across agent harnesses without writing per-environment glue code.
Connect a GitHub repo of Harbor tasks. OpenReward detects each task, builds Docker sandbox images, redeploys only changed tasks and shows build status per task. Harbor environments can run with Claude Code's default toolset or with other harness toolsets through Firehorse.
Why it matters: Teams with tasks already in Harbor format can host them on OpenReward without rewriting them.
The gr.inc news page lists FT coverage dated 2026-04-10 ('AI punters lose their shirts on Premier League bets') and The Times ('Superhuman AI models fail to predict football scores'). The FT article is paywalled and was not read directly. TechSpot (2026-04-13) and Decrypt (2026-04-15, https://decrypt.co/364406/ai-beat-sports-betting-market-top-8-models) also covered the results.
Why it matters: Tier-1 press coverage gives a small lab visibility.
A long-horizon, non-stationary benchmark. Agents build betting strategies across the 2023-24 EPL season. On the current release-page leaderboard every model has a negative mean ROI: Claude Opus 4.7 -3.7%, GPT-5.4 -7.9%, GPT-5.5 -9.6%, Claude Opus 4.6 -11.2%. The page says many models hit ruin, defined as total loss of bankroll in at least one seed.
Why it matters: An open benchmark for long-horizon, real-world sequential decisions. It shows a clear gap between the strategies models can describe and what they actually do.